 |
|
|
By Evans Lyndon New Hampshire Herald
|
|
|
|
Comment on this story
|
|
|
Maybe you sent your ten-year-old granddaughter to school this morning with turkey on rye, an apple, and a fruit roll-up. You might be worrying that she’ll have another argument with her best friend or freeze up on the test you helped her study for last night.
Or perhaps you dropped your nine-year-old nephew off at the bus stop and made sure he had an extra packet of Kleenex in his pocket in case that pesky cough kicked in. You might be nervous that he’ll try to make the kids laugh by putting invisible glue on the teacher’s chair again or that the class bully will call him chubby in front of his buddies like he did last week.
But did you ever imagine having to worry that the child you dropped off at elementary school this morning might pick up a free condom between classes? A Provincetown, MA. School committee on Tuesday June 8, okayed the distribution of condoms to elementary and high school students as a save guard towards teen pregnancy. But parents are concerned that the decision does not give them the right to counsel their kids out of the policy.
Even though the new policy has been greeted with much condemnation from the public, Peter Grosso, school committee chair, trying to be a little conservative with the way the policy is administered suggested that the committee “gives kids opportunity to have instructional conversation with school authorizes before taking the condoms. But most of the committee members were worried about the leniency that would have required that students speak with a school nurse or trained counselor first before receiving a condom. Dr. Beth Singer, school superintendent argued that since there isn’ t any age limit on the distribution policy, she wanted younger students requesting condoms receive information on their use. “I don’t like that students can’t be discreet about this,” said school committee member Shannon Patrick. “They have to go and ask for it. I’d rather them not have the conversation [with counselors] and have the condom than not have the condom.”
“I can see some kids opting out because of the conversation. I’m not against the policy. I’m just trying to put myself in that teenager’s spot,” said committee member Carrie Notaro.
Singer said that although sex education is taught in health classes, there isn’t any detailed instruction on condom usage, including the fact that condoms are not a 100 percent guarantee against pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases.
“We’re talking about younger kids. They have questions they need answered on how to use them, when to use them,” Singer said. The board voted unanimously to approve the policy, but what is most controvercial is the fact that the policy does not have a minimum age limit and also does explicitly states that “the school district will not honor requests from parents that students not be allowed to receive condoms.”
“This decision by the Provincetown School Committee is disturbing and downright twisted.” A concerned parent lamented. “ The fact that anyone in our educational system deems it appropriate to provide free condoms to elementary school children – and to trample on parental rights in the process – is a complete and utter disgrace. It becomes clearer and clearer why so many parents home-school their children without a second thought.”
|
|
|